Keynote
Lecture
Fluctuation Free Matrix Representation in Expectation
Value Dynamical Issues and their Applications
Professor Metin Demiralp
Informatics Institute
Istanbul Technical University
TURKEY
E-mail:
metin.demiralp@be.itu.edu.tr
Abstract: Parabolic partial differential equations
are encountered in many diverse fields of science and
engineering and even managerial sciences, like classical
or quantum wave propagations, nonequilibrium statistical
mechanics, probabilistic and stochastic issues. In these
aspects, they are unignorable components of the
modellings in research areas like chemistry, biology,
and even business and economy. These types of equations
are generally first order in one coordinate which may be
regarded as time and second order in some other
coordinates which may be called space coordinates by
following the most frequently encountered cases of
modelling. Their first order temporal nature enforces
them to be accompanied by an initial condition while
certain boundary conditions should be imposed on spatial
coordinates because of the ellipticity in their operator
structures on spatial coordinates. Ellipticity means
boundary value problem nature and therefore the
expansions on certain orthonormal basis functions in
appropriately defined Hilbert spaces can be used as the
basic mathematical tools to construct the solutions. To
this end the unknown solution can be considered as an
infinite linear combination of the basis function
varying in spatial coordinates only, with temporally
changing linear combination coefficients. A complete set
of basis functions in Hilbert space enables us to use
the linear combination coefficients of a function as its
matrix (or vector in a better terminology)
representation. The linear operators mapping from the
considered Hilbert space to the same space can also be
given via their matrix representations. Matrix
representations are important because they convert the
abstractness of the Hilbert spaces to the concreteness
of the Cartesian spaces. A mapping from a Hilbert space
to itself can be described by an appropriately defined
linear operator while its matrix representation arises
as a tool mapping from a corresponding Cartesian space
to itself. Thus elliptic PDE nature mapping from an
appropriately defined Hilbert space to itself becomes a
transformation by a matrix from a corresponding
Cartesian space to itself by removing PDE related
problematic issues from the scene and leaving us with
the pleasent environment of the theory of matrices and
linear algebra.
A parabolic PDE describes an evolution in one coordinate
we call time, and therefore, it somehow defines a
dynamical change, or in mechanical terminology, motion.
When we use the matrix representation for the solution
and elliptic part of the PDE under consideration time
derivative of the unknown function becomes the time
derivative of the vector coming from the unknown
function’s matrix representation whereas the elliptic
part of that PDE becomes a time variant matrix when its
matrix representation is used. Therefore the PDE and the
accompanying boundary conditions define an infinite set
of ODEs accompanied by an initial condition whose given
vector function value at the beginning of the time comes
from the matrix representation of the initial value
function of the PDE. This infinite set of ODEs can be
solved under the initial vector condition. However this
may be considered as a formidable task because of the
infinite dimensionality and we intend to truncate those
ODEs appropriately to get an approximation. The
numerical efficiency of this truncation based
methodology completely depends on how the basis
functions are constructed. This issue depends on rather
modelling nature of the PDE under consideration.
What we have mentioned above is basically for the case
of linear elliptic operator including PDEs. When the
nonlinearity comes to the scene the matrix
representations may become complicated and the tools of
linear space may not work. Although there are of course
some possibilities for these cases, they will be kept
out of the content of this presentation.
Even in the linear case of ODEs the dimensionality may
become an unpleasent problem if it grows undesiredly.
Those cases can be treated in a different way by using
fluctuation free matrix representation and the
dimensionality growth can be suppressed accordingly in
many cases. The fluctuation free matrix representation
is based on fluctuationlessness theorem conjectured and
proven by the presenter. It states that the matrix
representation of an algebraic function operator which
multiplies its operand with the function under
consideration in the operator definition, is equivalent
to the image of the universal matrix which is the matrix
representation of the independent variable operator
multiplying its operand by the independent variable,
under the abovementioned function, over the same basis
function set. This equivalence holds when the set is
complete to span entire Hilbert space wheras any
incompleteness coming from the usage of a subset of the
complete basis function set destroys this equivalence.
However, even in the case of incompleteness, the
deviation from the equivalence come from the fluctuation
terms which are related to the differences of the matrix
representations of powers of the independent variable
from the same power of the matrix representation of the
independent variable alone. These fluctuation terms may
tend to quite rapidly vanish when the considered set
approaches or gets close to the whole basis set. Hence
theorem dictates the equivalence for all cases when all
fluctuations are ignored. This theorem enables us to
simplify the matrix representation of the PDE’s elliptic
part at the threshold of fluctuation free
representations and therefore to construct good quality
approximations. Talk will be about these issues up to
certain details which can be given as much as time
allows.
Brief Biography of the Speaker:
Metin Demiralp was born in Turkey on 4 May 1948. His
education from elementary school to university was
entirely in Turkey. He got his BS, MS, and PhD from the
same institution, Istanbul Technical University. He was
originally chemical engineer, however, through
theoretical chemistry, applied mathematics, and
computational science years he was mostly working on
methodology for computational sciences and he is
continuing to do so. He has a group (Group for Science
and Methods of Computing) in Informatics Institute of
Istanbul Technical University (he is the founder of this
institute). He collaborated with the Prof. Herschel A.
Rabitz’s group at Princeton University (NJ, USA) at
summer and winter semester breaks during the period
1985–2003 after his 14 months long postdoctoral visit to
the same group in 1979–1980. Metin Demiralp has more
than 90 papers in well known and prestigious scientific
journals, and, more than 170 contributions to the
proceedings of various international conferences. He
gave many invited talks in various prestigious
scientific meetings and academic institutions. He has a
good scientific reputation in his country and he is one
of the principal members of Turkish Academy of Sciences
since 1994. He is also a member of European Mathematical
Society and the chief–editor of WSEAS Transactions on
Computers currently. He has also two important awards of
turkish scientific establishments. The important recent
foci in research areas of Metin Demiralp can be roughly
listed as follows: Fluctuation Free Matrix
Representations, High Dimensional Model Representations,
Space Extension Methods, Data Processing via
Multivariate Analytical Tools, Multivariate Numerical
Integration via New Efficient Approaches, Matrix
Decompositions, Multiway Array Decompositions, Enhanced
Multivariate Product Representations, Quantum Optimal
Control.
|